sonak wrote:
CorporalCaptain wrote:
BillJ wrote:
Which is non-sense. Nature isn't an intelligent being...
|
It's as much of a figure of speech as "natural selection". |
yes, but you were using it to justify an ethical stance, so admitting that nature DOESN'T choose invalidates your argument. |
Where was I doing that? What I meant was that Phlox's bottom line was let nature choose. On rereading what I said, I can see that I might not have been clear that I was speaking to what Phlox considered the ultimate issue to be.
Phlox never really took any other stance, is what I meant.