Cinema Geekly wrote:
I'd have to assume they know something. I don't think a big time entertainment mag would make such assumptions like say IMDB.
Plus I would think that JJ and company would have a big problem with this either way due to the wide circulation, but everything was kind of pointing onwards Khan being involved all along.
It could've also been a sloppy headline writer for the webpage, especially if the print issue mentions nothing.
So, I wonder if there are any definitive mentions of the name in the print issue? I wonder if lawyers are being consulted by certain executives, directors, and publishers right now? I wonder if this was an intentional leak? I wonder if someone just got fired?