[shivkala]

Dream wrote:

---

I thought it was good.

I wouldn't really call it a horror movie. It was more of a romantic comedy. It was obviously inspired by Romeo and Juliet, with two characters from two different groups meeting up and finding out the other side isn't that bad. The bonies were cool baddies.

It was pretty funny at times and there was a nice ending.

Kind of hard to miss that when there's a balcony scene between Julie and R.

I was drafted into taking my daughter and her friends to celebrate her 13th birthday. It was pretty clear that she was the demographic, but I enjoyed it, a lot. I found myself laughing and really engaged in what was going on.

I saw a post on Facebook "boycotting" what they called the "pussification of horror movies" and trying to link this to Twilight. I don't see this in any way, shape, or form presenting a threat to horror movies. It's not a horror movie, it's really not billed as one, and judging by the preview for [i]The Last Exorcism Part II," I don't think horror movies have anything to fear (pun, intended).

My main problem with it was, what, in my opinion was a plot hole you could drive through

as in "drive a mustang through." Why didn't Julie take advantage of the Mustang to drive off with R in the first place? That whole scene bothered me, as it was too dangerous for her to leave the plane and go a few feet, let alone all the way to the garage. I guess R could have driven the car up to the plane, but then, that leads to the second major problem of that whole "driving up and down the runway scene..."

Namely, once in the car, how would it be "not safe" to just take the car and head to the city?

The car even had enough gas to get within a quarter mile (half mile, at most) of the wall!