|
Re: Do you think Star Trek needed a reboot?
Jackson_Roykirk wrote:
BillJ wrote:
Jackson_Roykirk wrote:
It certainly resembles a two-hour TNG TV episode.
|
A very bad two-hour episode.  |
Meh. It was fine.
It didn't knock my cocks off as a movie should, but it was still a story worth watching. If it WAS a TNG episode, it would be ranked "slightly above mediocre" compared to the rest of the bidy of work that was the TNG TV series. However, being a feature film, "slightly above mediocre" is not good enough. |
I'd rather watch a Code of Honor/Angel One double-feature than be subjected to Insurrection again. 
__________________
"You know. 1966? Seventy-nine episodes, about thirty good ones." - Phillip Fry describing Star Trek, Futurama
|