|
Re: TNG: Silent Weapons by David Mack Review Thread (Spoilers!)
rfmcdpei wrote:
TerraUnam wrote:
I read it last night. One nitpick:
A Unitarian Church? You had to go and make Esperanza a Unitarian of all things? 
Good grief man, what happened to the Holy and Undivided Trinity in the 24th Century? 
Were the Presbyterians not available? |
Even if you're joking, that sort of religious bigotry is completely uncalled for. Why not Unitarians in the 24th century? (And what, exactly, are wrong with Presbyterians?) |
There is nothing wrong with Presbyterians, that's my point. A Unitarian is explicitly not a Trinitarian, which is the belief position of every other church you can think of today. That is a problem if, like me, you take the Trinity seriously.
__________________
Fate protects fools, little children and ships named Enterprise.
But not ships named Columbia.
|