[Christopher]

Hartzilla2007 wrote:

---

I don't know that still sounds like Data is back from the dead, which would still be cop out. I mean you even said that it can be taken as Data is back from the dead with a few differences.

Nobody is getting my point -- probably because you're judging it without having actually read the book, which is no way to go about having a discussion. I'm not saying it has to be interpreted one way or the other. My whole point is that it's ambiguous enough that you can interpret it either way depending on your personal preferences.