Burma Ryder wrote:
IIRC, there are only two TOS episodes which feature the Romulans: Balance of Terror & The Enterprise Incident. I love both of these episodes and all of the Romulan characters in them. However, I must say that I have always found it odd that the Romulans in BOT spoke in a very aristocratic and somewhat Shakespearian manner:
COMMANDER: Danger and I are old companions.
CENTURION: We've seen a hundred campaigns together, and still I do not understand you.
COMMANDER: I think you do. No need to tell you what happens when we reach home with proof of the Earthmen's weakness. And we will have proof. The Earth commander will follow. He must. When he attacks, we will destroy him. Our gift to the homeland, another war.
CENTURION: If we are the strong, is this not the signal for war?
COMMANDER: Must it always be so? How many comrades have we lost in this way?
CENTURION: Our portion, Commander, is obedience.
COMMANDER: Obedience. Duty. Death and more death. Soon even enough for the Praetor's taste. Centurion, I find myself wishing for destruction before we can return. Worry not. Like you, I am too well-trained in my duty to permit it. Continue evasive manoeuvres. Now, back to the first course.
While in TEI, the Romulan Commander adopts more of a stereotypical almost cartoonish "we have ways of making you talk" language style:
COMMANDER: We have not even begun! There's no force that I can use on a Vulcan that will make him speak. That is a fact. But there are Romulan methods completely effective against humans and human weaknesses.
SPOCK: You would not resort to them, Commander. They would prove ineffective against the captain.
COMMANDER: Then they will leave him dead, or what might be worse than dead. But I will know your unspoken truths.
I think the O.P. makes a fair point about the stylistic differences between the two eps.
"Balance of Terror" has been acclaimed time after time as a TOS homage to THE ENEMY BELOW of 1957 cinema. "The Enterprise Incident" has, at best, received mix reviews. David Gerrold harshly criticized "Incident", comparing it to the controversial 1968 Pueblo Incident
. While I can understand Gerrold's point, "Incident" came across to me as more of a self-defense intrigue story than a jingoistic glorification of Cold War espionage. Still, if there was a "downgrade", it was in the quality of the story as realized through the characters. In "Balance of Terror", the story explores the motivations and anxieties of both warring ships' crews. In "Incident", we see bad play-acting on the part of a Federation attempt to steal strategic Romulan technology, enabled by the apparent romantic weakness of an inept Romulan commander. The two stories are hardly in the same league dramatically.
The striking thing about "Balance of Terror" apart from the rest of the entire STAR TREK franchise is that we were told that the Romulans were an unknown people, isolated from Earth and the Federation after a crude war fought 100 years before. The "Shakespearian" manner of the characters in "Balance" makes them seem more stilted, but also more alien and thus more interesting. They are mysterious... for this first episode only. Subsequent stories throughout all series usually make the Romulans look like a stereotypical Nazi- or Soviet-like Cold War plot device. Even the TNG staff's excellent work in bringing Tomalak and Jarok to life rests on this cruder, less elegant approach. "The Enemy," "The Defector" and "Face of the Enemy" were high-water-marks for TNG's use of the Romulans, but the TNG staff never managed to transcend this old pattern of presenting the Romulans as Cold Warriors.
BTW: we should not allow this thread to dwell on the "Shakespearian" nature of any of TOS' characters without slipping in a mention of Chang in THE UNDISCOVERED COUNTRY. TMP6 was fun to watch, a guilty pleasure perhaps, but if given a choice, I would prefer the watch a well-worn rerun of "Balance". That's just me.