foxhot wrote:
Brando has less stinkers than Burton, but Sinatra and Heston have less than Brando. Ergo cognito kumquat.
|
Your thread title indicates this thread is about actors and acting, not the quality or lack of quality of the top 40 actors' various film roles. Now it seems you are simply ranking the "top 40 actors" by the quality of their movies.
It might help if you made it clear that your only real criteria is movie quality rather than performance and acting ability (or the other criteria listed inyour original post). In fact, a discussion of the quality of these actors' best or most notable movies might actually spur a
meaningful debate.
