Is there any proof - not just of the doping, but of the tangible benefits provided by the foundation ?
I'm sure there's proof enough for some, never enough for others - same as the doping.
We went through the same exercise with some major league baseball players a while back.
Wrong, we don't like winners.
You're saying Lance's stock should rise a bit?
So, anyway - does stripping this guy of his titles mean that they go to whoever was the runner-up or their team? What are the odds that the runners-up weren't doping? The history of the Tour de France is replete with this kind of thing
, after all.