Jeff O'Connor wrote:
Enterprise is Great wrote:
More vampires...ugh...way too much of that for my tastes.
Just one is more than enough for my taste, but eh. Wait for the wheel, as they say. The fad will die. Eventually. Probably. I think.
You'd think so, but I can't think of a time in the past several decades that vampires haven't been fashionable. Before Being Human
, it was Blade
, before that it was Buffy/Angel
, before that it was Forever Knight
and the Dark Shadows
remake series and Bram Stoker's Dracula
, and before that it was The Lost Boys
and Anne Rice's novels which started the whole vampire fad in the '80s. Although there was certainly vampire fiction on a continuing basis before then -- the original Dark Shadows
, a whole series of Dracula movies, I Am Legend
and its periodic movie adaptations, The Groovie Goolies
and The Drac Pack
in animation, Grandpa Munster, Count Chocula, you name it. Like its subjects, the vampire fad seems to be undying -- or at least prone to frequent resurrection.
You beat me to the punch. Vampires aren't a fad. With the possible exception of the 1950s, when alien invaders and radioactive mutants briefly eclipsed Gothic horror, there hasn't been a decade when vampires haven't been popular. On top of the stuff Christopher mentioned, let's not forget Hammer Films, Blacula, Count Yorga, Vampirella, Marvel's TOMB OF DRACULA (which spawned Blade), Morbius the Living Vampire, The Night Stalker, etc.
(The latter was once the top-rated TV-movie of all time, and that was back in the seventies, before Anne Rice or Buffy.)
Vampires have been hot since at least 1819. They're not going anywhere soon.
(Did I mention that my first book was a non-fiction history of vampire literature, published by a small academic press?)