There IS a reason, and I bet you can guess it since I just raised it as an issue, but absent that knowledge you're not making as informed a decision as you could be, ergo you're less likely to producing an effective scene than you would if you followed the rules.
I'd change that statement into "... if you knew
You don't have to follow them if you don't want to, but you should know what you're doing and why you're doing it.
You're right on that word choice. I tweaked that, as it's more what I meant than the word I'd written.
...Long before Picasso became the greatest abstract artist ever, he was a superbly trained traditional artist. He may have broken every rule in the book when he turned to cubism, but he knew exactly what he was doing and why. Jean Luc Godard, did the something with a film in the 60's. He deliberately used weird camera angles and distracting cuts to create a specific effect.
Exactly. I like to say you need to be able to walk before you can run.
I don't want to pull this into a discussion about cinematography, as I was merely using it illustrate a principle about "rules". The real topic here is writing, after all.