View Single Post
Old June 18 2012, 09:08 PM   #174
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: David Brin's latest novel, and a TED talk

sojourner wrote: View Post
RAMA wrote: View Post
sojourner wrote: View Post
^Dude, do you think we aren't aware of that billions of dollars boondoggle ITER?

I think the major misconception here is with the term "nanotechnology". The term implies the science fiction realization of the technology in being nanomachines. The reality is that most of the advances in nanotechnology has only been in materials, not machines. Nanomachine technology has not advanced that much at all. Like fusion, it's perpetually 20 years in the future. Until some real breakthroughs appear in the "machine" field the so called singularity is just a fantasy. Even in the materials field nanotechnology has had problems. How many years have researchers spent trying to mass produce carbon nanotube materials?

Materials technology now, but considering the industry started from basically 0 to now a a $2 billion industry, its happened quite fast since Engines of Creation...not only that, carbon nanotubes are one of the greatest areas of recent breakthroughs. I could literally posts dozens of links on the subject so here's just a taste.

http://www.kurzweilai.net/ibm-resear...-breakthroughs

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2011/n...es-111611.html

http://www.kurzweilai.net/stanford-e...ient-computing

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl0730965

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-pgt050712.php

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/1...76490802544269

At one time fusion was at a standstill, now after recent breakthroughs and the groundbreaking for the test reactor, its moving forward again.
To save myself time, I just bolded the part of my previous post that you apparently failed to comprehend.

Also, did you read the articles you linked? Half of them concede the issue of mass production while most of them only deal with application, not production.

You really, really need to stop just spamming links and start reading what they say and don't say.

How did I miss anything? They are NOT being mass produced as most of their uses are applications of what's being researched, which I conceded before, these links demonstrate the rapid advances in the area, one which I get a lot of updates on in my technology news feeds both on my phone at home. It's an area which shows a lot of promise(according to the researchers..), some of the links even specify the milestones in it's development, like the 1Ghz threshold. Remember, this tech is one that's growing exponentially now, some applications will pay dividends in a 5-6 year time frame, other proclamations for nanotube's uses will take a longer road, 20-50 years.

I'm well aware that many links specify problems as well as applications and solutions, working through these issues is part of what makes it so interesting. I wouldn't consider them worthwhile if they didn't cover all aspects of the technology pro and con.

RAMA
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote