View Single Post
Old June 16 2012, 11:48 PM   #146
sojourner
Admiral
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: SpaceX is a go for April 30th: 1st commercial launch to space stat

publiusr wrote: View Post
That tinkertoy approach actually costs you more in the long run. Most missions we have now don't need assembly.
incorrect.

We don't have any missions now that require an HLV. In the long run it is cheaper to tinkertoy missions together. Economy of scale on MLV's out paces launching one or two HLV's per year pretty much any way you look at it.

Just for example, how much mass could you put in orbit aboard Atlas 5's or Falcon 9's compared to the cost of one launch of SLS? Assuming SLS ever gets built?

Carolyn goes on to say in the same post that "Planetary scientists want cheap rockets". Which completely conflicts with her assertion that she wants SLS sized missions.

Heck, your quote from John Grunsfeld contradicts her quote about rocket coming before the mission. He's designing a mission (this super resolution earth telescope) before having a vehicle to lift it on.

And neither of them seem to understand that SLS will leave no money to develop those missions they want.
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote