View Single Post
Old June 16 2012, 08:39 PM   #145
publiusr
Commodore
 
Re: SpaceX is a go for April 30th: 1st commercial launch to space stat

That tinkertoy approach actually costs you more in the long run. Most missions we have now don't need assembly. It is just better to have all liquid handling done here on the ground. ISS modules are rather cramped--especially the Soviet versions. Remember, the American ISS parts werelaunched by shuttle so they are just cans--all propulsion was handled by orbiters which no longer fly.

A couple other folks on SLS--Carolyn Porco of the Cassini mission
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...8485#msg848485

So, yes, the capability of the rocket DOES come before the mission design and the payload determination.

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...8427#msg848427

John Grunsfeld
http://www.nature.com/news/an-astron...ientist-1.9835

The other is the size of the SLS. If down the road we wanted to launch a telescope that could, for instance, study the entire energy balance of Earth with pixel sizes smaller than clouds, it would take a big telescope. With a big rocket, you can think start to think about launching big optical systems. We think of the SLS as the human spaceflight programme, but it could be hugely enabling for science.
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote