Thread: Ghosts?
View Single Post
Old March 28 2012, 05:12 PM   #32
Location: Stamford, CT
View Kooz's Twitter Profile
Re: Ghosts?

horatio83 wrote: View Post
RAMA wrote: View Post
Tora Ziyal wrote: View Post
Perhaps. There's really no proof either way.
Well not quite right....those who express a belief in ghosts must support their position, the current evidence is that they do not exist. Lack of evidence however is not proof.
That's not how science works. It works via the falsification of hypotheses. So claiming that ghosts do not exist without providing evidence is dubious from a scientific point of view (while being of course totally sound from a commonsensical point of view). In science the burden of proof is always on the guy who says this is wrong, not on the guy who theorizes and comes up with funky hypotheses.
That's not quite right. You start with a null hypothesis. If you want to assert the existence of ghosts, the burden of proof is on you. That's how it works. Plus, there's no way of proving a negative, so science can't work that way.
Follow me!
Kooz is offline   Reply With Quote