We're talking about a five year mission, not "months."
But we assume no member of the crew was confined to the ship for the entire 5 years.
Or are you suggesting that contemporary submarines not be tubes, but long blocks -- something like a massive 2x4, underwater? By your reasoning, that is the most "practical" design.
Read my post again. Of course a submarine has to have a hydrodynamic shape. The Enterprise
’s engineering hull is roughly cylindrical because it looks cool. I was talking about making the most efficient use of available space.
Captain Tracy wrote:
You can always, by-in-large, tell the authenticity of a CAPTAIN TRACY
post; as they, on-the-whole, will employ a high degree of accuracy with regard to: content, style, and punctuation - not to mention: wit, wisdom, and general 'snarkiness'.
The phrase is “by and
Nerys Myk wrote:
While I agree that the curves corridors were meant to indicate locations in the primary hull, I would hesitate to say the ship was designed to show space was at a premium.
The corridors were pretty wide and tall. Not unlike a hotel or apartment building. No ducking your head or turning sideways to pass.
They had to be roomy enough to accomodate a camera dolly, microphone boom, trailing cables and filming crew. No Steadicams in those days.