Tom Servo wrote:
The Castellan wrote:
I'm getting tired of this "flagship" nonsense. Plus does want want a "flagship" to be run by JJ Kirk?
Personally, JJ just said it was so big because he wanted it to sound cool...., excuse me, ...."kewl". That, or to make up for some sort of shortcoming.
But, here's something I posted in my art thread, and I think it's an excellent way to improve the JJPrise.
I really don't understand the personal attacks on JJ Abrams, just because he didn't make a Trek film the way YOU would have.
It's cause of that reaction that I LOVE the fact that the film was a commercial, and critical success, and was well received by the public, moreso then any other Trek film. And they they are making another.
Seeing as how this one got dumbed down to appeal to the Joe sixpack crowds, by making Trek into a mindless popcorn action flick, I would not call it a success. To me, success is more of attitude rather than aptitude. Like if a guy sells out in order to make it big, I'd not call him a winner, I'd call him a loser. And with Trek being dumbed down to appeal to the mass mainstream folks who watch Jersey Shore, Dancing with the Stars, TMZ and other rubbish, I don't exactly call that a success....just sanitized, sterilized, pasturized and homogenized to make ole' Joe Sixpack and Plain Jane happy.