View Single Post
Old December 23 2011, 06:17 AM   #382
archeryguy1701
Rear Admiral
 
archeryguy1701's Avatar
 
Location: Cheyenne, WY
Send a message via Yahoo to archeryguy1701
Re: If you don't think Nemesis is better than Star trek 2009....

trek_futurist wrote: View Post
snowman1701 wrote: View Post
How many of the other movies don't force you to suspend disbelief?
The difference is that star trek, prior to this, never asked you to just shut out command structure as being meaningless when it comes to promotion. It was a weak attempt at moving the non-existent plot along. And bob orci should be ashamed of himself for not thinking of something better.
And there we have it, ladies and gentlemen! The reason Star Trek 2009 sucked: They took liberties with a fictional chain of command! The bastards!!

Also, to go along with your gripe that old Trek used scientific advisors... I hate to break it to you, but new Trek did too. And she apparently knows sciencey stuff too.
__________________
"If it weren't for stupid, difficult races, there'd simply be no point to living."

Sometimes you just gotta roll the hard six- Bill Adama
archeryguy1701 is offline