View Single Post
Old June 29 2011, 03:16 PM   #28
STR's Avatar
Location: Out there. Thatta way.
Re: The DARPA 100 Year Starship

John O. wrote: View Post
Actually I think the idea of even building warheads again, for any purpose, would be difficult to sell, in part because it involves rebuilding a lot of government infrastructure associated with nuclear arms construction and there'd be a hoopla over that.
As far as I'm aware, they never really disassembled much of the warhead building infrastructure. You actually need a fair amount of infrastructure to maintain and refurbish existing warheads. In fact, it appears that they've recently begun replacing older structures with new ones, like the "Kansas City Plant" which makes electronic and mechanical components for warheads.
An egotist is someone more interested in himself than me.
STR is offline   Reply With Quote