|
Re: Do you think star trek will still be around 150-200 years from now
Shikarnov wrote:
I voted no. Had the original continuity been preserved, I think Trek could have been a form of ongoing mythology, resurfacing every so often with new and interesting ways to critique contemporary issues. However, in its rebooted form, it's become just another action packed fun flick with no redeeming value whatsoever. If anybody in 2161 knows about Trek, it'll probably be from having visited a Hollywood museum.
|
This is why we need to make it a religion so that it continues on into the ages, it's continuity and canon unquestioned.
Who's with me?
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes.
J'onn: It's all I have.
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
Last edited by teacake; May 1 2011 at 01:11 AM.
|