Mal wrote:
Hyperspace05 wrote:
Some skepticism would serve you well.
|
how many papers until you believe? |
How about we start with more than one? I do not subscribe to the
"someone blogged/posted/e-mailed it so it must be true" philosophy. (I'm not saying you do either, but it seems rather popular these days) The phrase
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" springs to mind.
I am quite certain that we do not understand the universe as well as we think we do. But every paradigm shift requires something substantial. And that means something more than this... And lets just say that this is not the first claim of this kind.