Greg Cox wrote:
(I still can't see them ever allowing Bruce on SMALLVILLE, though. The BATMAN movies are too much of a golden goose to risk hurting them.)
I just don't understand the logic. I mean, I get how they may not want a live-action Batman series that might retread similar ground the current films are covering.
But, how would one appearance on Smallville
really hurt the Nolan film series? I don't see how that would "hurt the brand" anymore than the current Batman cartoon or the direct-to-DVD animated features would.