View Single Post
Old May 11 2009, 10:39 PM   #1449
Trek Bob
Ensign
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Trek Bob wrote: View Post
Nimthim wrote: View Post
Trek Bob wrote: View Post


Im sorry, I agree with the "lazy writing" analysis. See, I think that the writers tried to jam too much back story into a short 2 hour film. Personally, I think that certain things did need a more elaborate set up and a much more in-depth development. For instance, if it is true that they had already sent their ships to destroy Earth's defenses, a quick 1 minute shot of those ships attacking Earth's defenses would have cleared that right up. That said, since when does a mining ship have enough fire power to take out EARTH's defense net?? One little mining ship would never have been enough for that.
Remember, we're not bashing on the movie just to bash... we're doing it because we care and want the writers to fix it the next time around (and believe me, I DO hope there is another one). Through all its faults, this movie did excite me about the franchise again and I'd be more than happy to see the next one. All I ask is not to have my intelligence insulted by one of my favorite series, thats all.
One little mining ship?????? Did you not see the expositional shot of the Kelvin beside the Narada - worse than a rowboat taking on an aircraft carrier.
Not enough for its ships to take out the planet's defenses I would think.
Besides, Its still a mining ship not a battleship.
Trek Bob is offline   Reply With Quote