We're probably not
going to see a Let It Be
DVD release. At least, not for a very long time. People would need to change.
The problem is that Paul, Ringo, Yoko, and Olivia need to be in 100-percent agreement; it's how the Beatles are structured. (It's the same reason that as much as Paul wants to see "Carnival of Light" released, it won't be; George vetoed it thirteen years ago for Anthology 2
, and Olivia's probably going to keep on vetoing it.)
It's widely believed that Paul is the sticking point on Let It Be
, yet he's the one who has said in interviews frequently that he would like to see it released.
My guess is that Yoko is the sticking point. The film doesn't paint a particularly flattering portrait of John, and Yoko has a particular image of John that she's fought for nearly thirty years to protect. Look at the way Imagine: John Lennon
whitewashes the early 70s (and casts May Pang's role in an ahistorical light), or her anger toward Philip Norman's new biography (which is rather positive, actually). As much as Yoko says herself that John Lennon was just a man, anything that actually shows
that he was anything other than St. John of Lennon doesn't fly with her.
One of the best suggestions I've heard is that the cannisters of film footage from the Twickenham and Apple sessions could be recut into a completely different film of the making of Let It Be
, one that put a rosier picture on what happened in those days as a supplement or a replacement for the film. In a way, the final part of The Beatles Anthology
is almost there. But that may be the most... inoffensive version of events of early 1969 that's possible, too.