|
Re: what's with huge production budgets?
TheMasterOfOrion wrote:
Trubinator wrote:
Agree?
|
Totally agree
I still love my explosions, my scifi, my action and my blcokbusters...but I just wish they could scale back with the over-spending
I still have a hunger for blockbusters
IRONMAN for me was a real winner, because even though the movie had top actors and explosions it delivered great bang for its pretty modest budget of $140 million production.
SupermanReturns was a failure, the movie was over the top and dull, its second weekend only totaled $20 million but it managed to claw back some of the loss with healthy dvd sales. Look at the cost of making movies Waterworld ( $230 Mil adj inflation ) SupermanReturns ($300 Mil), KingKong ($210 Mil) and despite the huge sums of money spent these movies were extremely boring or complete flops. |
King Kong was a flop? I thought it did quite well at the box office.
__________________
"Scary"
*pulls out 2 guns*
"Scarrier"
(P.M. me if you know where the quote is from  )
|