The Trek BBS

The Trek BBS (http://www.trekbbs.com/index.php)
-   Trek Literature (http://www.trekbbs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=43)
-   -   Interview with Christopher L. Bennett (http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=67736)

makcalhoun September 22 2008 09:10 PM

Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Hello,

we from the German Star Trek Fan page TrekZone Network (http://www.trekzone.de) had the chance to interview Mr. Christopher L. Bennett for our literature newsletter.

We want to thank Mr. Bennett for this great interview and post it now down here for all of you.

Greetings from Germany (and greetings to my trekBBS friend Kopernikus)!

Joern Podehl


TrekZone Network: When did you start writing fiction and for how long have you been a professional author now?

Christopher L. Bennett: I dabbled with writing in high school, but made my first attempts to write professionally around 1991. I made my first professional sale in 1998.


TZN: You studied physics first and a couple of years later history, too. Was this in preparation to become a professional author or did you originally have different career plans? If you hear that somebody studied physics, the idea that that person writes fiction novels does not come to mind immediately.

CLB: I majored in those subjects mainly because I was interested in them. I never really accepted the idea that education should be a means toward a specific career rather than learning for its own sake. The only reason I declared a physics major the first time was because I had to declare something. When I went back for my history degree, I did focus on global and cross-cultural history because I knew it would be helpful for my writing, but mainly I wanted to satisfy my curiosity, compensate for the profoundly Western-biased history education I'd gotten earlier, and hopefully meet girls. Sadly, I had mixed results with that last part.

And there have actually been a lot of physicists and astronomers who write science fiction, including Hal Clement, Gregory Benford, Robert L. Forward, David Brin, Catherine Asaro, Carl Sagan, Charles Sheffield, and TNG writer/producer Naren Shankar.


TZN: Who is Christopher L. Bennett: What can you tell us about your person and what your interests and hobbies are? What does your family think about your work - and about Star Trek?

CLB: There's not much to tell. My work pretty much defines my life these days. My main hobby is surfing and posting online, but that's closer to an addiction. I read, I watch TV, and I try to eat right and stay in shape. The only family I'm close to is my father, who isn't particularly into ST but enjoys my work. I've heard positive responses from other family members, though.


TZN: What kind of books do you like to read and what kind of TV shows and series do you look in your free time?

CLB: Most of what I read and watch is in the science fiction, fantasy, and superhero genres. I sometimes watch other dramas such as "Law & Order" and "House".


TZN: To what extent can you (and do you) draw on the knowledge you gained through your studies of physics and history in your writings?

CLB: I make pretty heavy use of my knowledge of science and history. They're both very useful disciplines for writing SF – science for understanding how nature works, history for understanding how societies work, evolve, and interact.


TZN: You have written mainly for Star Trek. How come?

CLB: I'd prefer to have a lot more original fiction under my belt, but it hasn't worked out that way. But I was lucky enough to be given an opportunity to write ST fiction, and I've repeatedly been asked to come back and do more. I haven't pursued many other franchises because there are only so many that I'm interested in or qualified for. I am still working on branching out into original fiction, though.


TZN: Within the Star Trek universe, you have authored stories for nearly all of the different shows. Do you have a favorite show that you like to write for in particular? If you do, why that one?

CLB: I don't have a single favorite series to write for. What I find most satisfying is writing stories that give me a lot of freedom to be creative, whether it's a novel that features an original crew like the Titan books, that advances continuity beyond the end of the series like Greater Than the Sum, that fills in an unexplored gap like Ex Machina or The Buried Age, or that takes place in an alternate history like Places of Exile.


TZN: You have written short novels, such as "Places of Exile", which you have written recently for the "Myriad Universes" anthology, as well as full-blown novels. Which format is more fun to write?

CLB: Writing is rarely fun. It's satisfying and rewarding, but writing a novel of any length is grueling work. I suppose that a short novel would typically be easier, but that wasn't true of Places of Exile, because I had a very big, epic story to tell and it was difficult to cram it into 55,000 words.


TZN: You are one of the few authors who provide ample annotations for their novels online. What drives you to publish your notes online?

CLB: For me, the worldbuilding part of science fiction is almost more enjoyable than the actual storytelling part. I'm known for writing character-driven fiction, but that's something I had to learn. Innately, I'm more from the school of SF writers that focus on imagining new worlds and technologies and exploring how they work. I enjoy analyzing and explaining things.

Also, I've always believed that science fiction can be a valuable tool for education. I've learned a lot about the universe from the hard SF I've read, and I want my work to be informative too. It frustrates me that virtually all SF in film and television badly misrepresents physics, astronomy, biology, and the like, because it's squandering a great opportunity.


TZN: Which of your own novels do you regard as your best one? And is there one in particular which in retrospect you would like to rework or one you would rather not have written at all?

CLB: Orion's Hounds is the book that satisfies me the most. It comes closest to being a work of pure, original science fiction and is a very successful, expansive exercise in worldbuilding. I'm also very fond of X-Men: Watchers on the Walls. Even though it was written for a more fanciful and more restrictive franchise than Star Trek, it's a book I really enjoy revisiting and re-reading.

I don't have major regrets about any of my novels, and there's nothing I'd take back. There are a few minor continuity issues in Ex Machina I'd tweak in retrospect, and I wish Places of Exile hadn't been quite so compressed in time.


TZN: Some people regard your latest novel, "Greater Than The Sum", mainly as a stopgap within the context of the TNG relaunch. What's your opinion on that?

CLB: I haven't heard anyone describe it that way, and I don't really understand the characterization. A stopgap is a temporary substitute, a makeshift fill-in for something else. GTTS is an integral part of the TNG continuity, moving the series forward and setting the stage for what's to come.


TZN: As a fan of "Star Trek", what's your opinion on the TNG relaunch in general? The project has been criticized by some as too Borg-centric. Do you share that sentiment? And what do you think of the controversy of Peter David's book "Before Dishonor"? It was criticized very hard.

CLB: It's not really my place to comment on the controversy. My responsibility is to tell my own stories and to make the most of what I'm given to work with. My priority in GTTS was to move the series forward and set the stage for what followed, but I also tried to put what came before in context and show how it could all work as a cohesive whole.

I don't think there's really such a thing as a “Borg-centric” story, since story comes from character and the Borg are basically an impersonal force of nature. The essence of a Borg story lies in how its characters cope with the Borg threat, or else in exploring how liberated drones (such as Picard, Seven, or Hugh) deal with their past. So each “Borg story” is really a story about people coping with the consequences of the Borg, and thus each one is different.


TZN: The upcoming "Destiny" trilogy by David Mack is said to fundamentally change the Star Trek universe. You're currently working on a post-"Destiny" novel ("Titan: Over A Torrent Sea"). How did "Destiny" impact your work on "Over A Torrent Sea"? In what ways did you have to coordinate with David Mack and Marco Palmieri?


CLB: Since Titan's adventures take place far beyond the Federation, there was very little overlap between OaTS and the other post-Destiny books. Mainly what I dealt with was the personal toll of the trilogy's events, how Titan's personnel deal with tragedy and move forward with their lives. Still, Dave, Keith DeCandido, Bill Leisner, Kirsten Beyer, and I have been staying in touch and sharing our manuscripts with each other to make sure all our books fit together. Marco is overseeing it all on his end, but he doesn't micromanage.


TZN: What can you tell us about "Over A Torrent Sea"? In how far will it differ from your previous "Destiny" novel, "Orion Hounds"?

CLB: It's another story exploring exotic alien life forms and environments, but on a different scale from Orion's Hounds. It's mostly set on a type of planet that was only theorized four years ago: an “ocean planet,” a world that's mostly water and ice by volume. No continents, no islands, just an endless ocean that might as well be bottomless too, since at around 90 kilometers down, the pressure becomes so crushingly huge that the water itself is forced into ice even though it's boiling hot. It's a planet full of exotic and unusual life forms that shouldn't even exist there. And it's grounded in cutting-edge planetary science.

Naturally, since it's an ocean world, the story focuses heavily on Aili Lavena, Titan's water-breathing navigator. She's even on the cover of the book, in an impressive painting by Cliff Nielsen. This is the first time we've really had a chance to get to know her, and she won't have many secrets left by the end. Heck, the cover alone leaves practically nothing to the imagination.


TZN: Star Trek producer Damon Lindelof said in a recent interview that the first thing the creative team behind the new movie did was to evaluate the State of the Union of Star Trek. From an author's perspective, what's Star Trek's current State of the Union according to you?

CLB: From an author's perspective, it's great. I don't think there's another media franchise where the tie-in books have such scope, originality, and freedom, and that's a great environment to work in. ST literature has always thrived when the onscreen franchise has been dormant. And I'm hoping that print and onscreen Trek will complement each other in the future better than they have at certain times in the past.


TZN: Regarding your future work: Do you have plans for other tie-ins beyond the Star Trek universe or maybe even original work in the near future?

CLB: I'm developing a few original projects, including a novel based on my first published story. As for other tie-ins, nothing's on the table at the moment, but I'm open to the possibility.


TZN: We like to cap off our TrekZone Network interviews with a distinct question, so here it is: Where do you see mankind in 100 years from now?

CLB: Almost certainly, the planet will be warmer and many of our coastal cities will have been submerged. I'm hopeful that we'll manage that transition wisely, but more likely we'll live in denial until it becomes desperate and make things a lot rougher for ourselves than they have to be. So we will most likely have gone through harsh times by then, but hopefully will be wiser and better for it. Probably we will have colonized space, mainly through the efforts of private enterprise with government backing, as has historically been the case with frontiers. The resources of space will have played a major role in helping Earth through its crisis, or else will provide a refuge for humans abandoning an increasingly inhospitable Earth. Our technology will have advanced in ways beyond anything ever seen in TV science fiction, probably including the genetic and bionic enhancement of our bodies, but I'm skeptical that we'll reach the godlike “Singularity” level proposed by many futurists and SF writers, since history shows that technological progress tends to be intermittent rather than exponential. We'll probably still be confined to our own star system but be aware of numerous other habitable planets and have unmanned probes en route to the nearer ones. And we'll probably be watching a reimagined Star Trek in some form and learning about the original series in school the way we learn about Dickens and Melville today.

Turtletrekker September 22 2008 09:16 PM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Cool! Thanks for posting this!

BrotherBenny September 22 2008 10:12 PM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
This is great stuff, and I agree about Lavena, but it's a great painting nonetheless.

Chris, I especially liked your answer about mankind a century from now. Is that something you'd explore in an original novel?

Christopher September 22 2008 10:14 PM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
^^Some of it is background in a spec novel I've already written and that I'm waiting for a certain editor to get around to reading...

Trent Roman September 22 2008 11:06 PM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Quote:

CLB: It's another story exploring exotic alien life forms and environments, but on a different scale from Orion's Hounds. It's mostly set on a type of planet that was only theorized four years ago: an “ocean planet,” a world that's mostly water and ice by volume. No continents, no islands, just an endless ocean that might as well be bottomless too, since at around 90 kilometers down, the pressure becomes so crushingly huge that the water itself is forced into ice even though it's boiling hot. It's a planet full of exotic and unusual life forms that shouldn't even exist there. And it's grounded in cutting-edge planetary science.
Only theorized four years ago? Voyager had a pelagic planet in "Thirty Days", as does the Star Wars universe (Mon Calamari, Kamino), the planet Water in Lexx and probably other settings. What distinction am I missing here?

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman

KRAD September 22 2008 11:10 PM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Christopher can answer with more authority, but I believe he meant that the notion of a scientifically plausible ocean planet was only theorized about four years ago. I think we can all agree that those two words rarely have applied to either Star Wars, Lexx, or Voyager. :)

The Scrooge Doctor September 22 2008 11:22 PM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Besides, wasn't the planet in "Thirty Days" artificial?

St. William Of Levittown September 22 2008 11:51 PM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Hey Chris --that was AWESOME!

Uh...outta curiosity, was a video made of this, or an audio-recording?

I'm sure a lot of people here would LOVE to watch it!

by the way, concerning this excerpt:

Quote:

TZN: You have written mainly for Star Trek. How come?

CLB: I'd prefer to have a lot more original fiction under my belt, but it hasn't worked out that way. But I was lucky enough to be given an opportunity to write ST fiction, and I've repeatedly been asked to come back and do more. I haven't pursued many other franchises because there are only so many that I'm interested in or qualified for. I am still working on branching out into original fiction, though.

Yeah, I'd love to have some original books published too. Of course, the vast majority of ideas in the ol' notebook are for Trek!

So...did you ever get any non-Trek stuff published? (Please, no snide comments, people. I honestly don't know!)

Stevil2001 September 22 2008 11:53 PM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Mon Cal isn't water all the way down, is it? There's a crust and stuff; it's just under the water.

St. William Of Levittown September 23 2008 12:02 AM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Doesn't Neptune have a mantle of water or something?

Christopher September 23 2008 12:41 AM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Quote:

KRAD wrote: (Post 2097353)
Christopher can answer with more authority, but I believe he meant that the notion of a scientifically plausible ocean planet was only theorized about four years ago. I think we can all agree that those two words rarely have applied to either Star Wars, Lexx, or Voyager. :)

What I mean is that the planet in the novel is a specific type of planet which was proposed in 2003 by Marc J. Kuchner and Alain Léger (independently), and which was given the formal name "ocean planet" by Léger in 2004. It's a scientific category name like "carbon planet" or "gas giant." Admittedly it's not a very descriptive name, because it doesn't just mean a pelagic planet, a rocky world with a thin veneer of ocean -- it means a planet that consists primarily of water, in liquid and ice form. In other words, something geologically similar to Titan, Enceladus, and many other gas-giant moons, but large enough and warm enough to have a liquid surface. (Wikipedia recommends using the term "ocean world" or "water world" for a planet like Mon Calamari, because "ocean planet" now has a specific technical meaning.)


Quote:

Rush Limborg wrote: (Post 2097454)
Uh...outta curiosity, was a video made of this, or an audio-recording?

I'm sure a lot of people here would LOVE to watch it!

If you're referring to the interview, it was conducted by e-mail. It only exists in print.

Quote:

So...did you ever get any non-Trek stuff published?
So far, only the two stories I got published in Analog in 1998 and 2000, both of which are available on my website.

Quote:

Doesn't Neptune have a mantle of water or something?
Yes. It and Uranus both belong to a subclass of giant planets called ice giants, because they're abundant in substances like water, methane, and ammonia which are normally ices in that part of the Solar system. Indeed, a Léger ocean planet is basically what Uranus or Neptune would have become if they had migrated closer to the Sun and had their hydrogen atmospheres evaporated away by its heat.

William Leisner September 23 2008 01:11 AM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Quote:

Christopher wrote: (Post 2097661)
Quote:

So...did you ever get any non-Trek stuff published?
So far, only the two stories I got published in Analog in 1998 and 2000, both of which are available on my website.

Marvel is non-Trek, isn't it? :vulcan:

Christopher September 23 2008 01:21 AM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Oh yeah. I was thinking "non-tie-in," because of the context of the quoted passage.

Ktrek September 23 2008 04:11 AM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Nice interview Chris and if you ever do finally get that original novel published I will be one of the first to buy a copy!

Kevin

D Man September 23 2008 08:57 AM

Re: Interview with Christopher L. Bennett
 
Great interview! Your physics background is probably your main appeal as a writer to me, and I can't get enough of every little bit of "hard science" you use in your novels. I'll also be near the front of the line to buy your first original novel, and I hope it comes sooner rather than later...I'm sure you do too, of course. ;)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.