The Trek BBS

The Trek BBS (http://www.trekbbs.com/index.php)
-   General Trek Discussion (http://www.trekbbs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=44)
-   -   Not real Star Trek (http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=225823)

King Daniel Into Darkness September 14 2013 10:51 AM

Not real Star Trek
 
People have been saying this since The Animated Series, The Motion Picture and The Wrath of Khan. It comes up with every new series, most notably The Next Generation. Some are saying it now about Into Darkness. So lets hear it - which is real and which is fake Star Trek? Which episodes or films and why?

Maurice September 14 2013 11:07 AM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
It's all fake. :D

Robert Comsol September 14 2013 11:28 AM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
I'll try to make this concise (yes, I know some here will say that would be a first :lol:):

IMHO, Star Trek had been and should be foremost about exploration, the exploration of the macrocosm (outer space) and the microcosm (i.e. the human condition) to qualify as "real" or "true" Star Trek according to Gene Roddenberry.

As strange as that may sound upon re-watching TAS, once you blend out the presentation and its target audience, there is so much "Star Trek" under its skin, that often it seemed to me, that TOS was a compromise Roddenberry had to accept but TAS gave him plenty of opportunities to present what he had tried to feature originally.

In a manner of speaking it feels to me like TNG is the continuation of TAS but for an adult target audience.

The biggest flaw of TMP, up to this day, is the deletion of the "Spock cries" scene. Its producers misunderstood that VFX is not what makes a movie great but the characters. But as a genuine science fiction film this one is among my top three with 2001 and Mission to Mars.

After that, IMO, Star Trek become too derivative once it started to compete with Star Wars (movies) or Babylon 5 (DS9).
Having "survived" the first two seasons of VOY I thought the show was really getting much better and truly went "where no man had gone before". Could be that their isolation from home and really being on their own gave it a genuine Star Trek feel I never quite had when watching TOS or TNG. :)

Bob

MarsWeeps September 14 2013 11:41 AM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
Star Trek was created as a TV series and that's where it belongs. Weekly episodes, each with a "message" or "moral to the story" that gets people to exercise their brains.

The problem with Star Trek these days is that there are only movies that come out every 3-4 years. Because of that, they use the same formula each time. "Evil Villain hell bent on revenge - causes massive death and destruction with lots of explosions!"

Until Star Trek comes back to TV, we are going to have to ignore Gene's vision and tolerate the same movie over and over again.

Saito S September 14 2013 12:30 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
All of it is real.

The entire notion of declaring certain parts of the franchise "not real Trek" or "not true Trek" is absurd, and really comes down to either "this part isn't real/true (because I don't like it)", or "this part isn't real/true because it doesn't conform to a narrow reading of what Trek 'should' be (often summed up as 'Gene's vision')."

And it's fine to not like parts of it, as well as to have favorite parts. We all have our likes and dislikes, and arguing about them here can be a bizarrely fun way to pass the time. But placing some kind of judgement on the parts that we dislike as being "not real Trek" is ridiculous. And it isn't as if we could ever get any kind of consensus on what the good and bad parts of Trek ARE. In the end, it's all down to our opinions.

So it's all real. Even the bad stuff, the cheesy stuff, the parts we'd prefer to forget - nobody ever said that Star Trek was perfect, and goodness knows, at times it's anything but.

But it's still all Star Trek. Yes, even Enterprise. :devil:

CommishSleer September 14 2013 12:45 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
Can someone explain GR's vision concisely so I can judge properly which pieces of 'alleged' Star Trek conform? :)

BillJ September 14 2013 01:10 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
Only The Cage and Threshold are real Star Trek.

CommishSleer September 14 2013 01:20 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
"The Cage" where multiple women are selected for one man might fit into GRs personal 'vision' I suppose. LOL. OK just joking.
But "the Cage" is the only part of Star Trek where GR didn't have to compromise. Although it seems GR was a bit of a collaborator (at least in TOS) and maybe compromise is what 'made' Star Trek.

cardinal biggles September 14 2013 01:41 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
Quote:

CommishSleer wrote: (Post 8643679)
Can someone explain GR's vision concisely so I can judge properly which pieces of 'alleged' Star Trek conform? :)

Which vision? His TOS vision or his TNG vision? ;)

King Daniel Into Darkness September 14 2013 03:09 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
Quote:

MarsWeeps wrote: (Post 8643628)
Star Trek was created as a TV series and that's where it belongs. Weekly episodes, each with a "message" or "moral to the story" that gets people to exercise their brains.

But isn't it true that very few of the episodes actually had messages or morals to the story? They aren't psalms, they're adventures in space first and foremost.
Quote:

The problem with Star Trek these days is that there are only movies that come out every 3-4 years. Because of that, they use the same formula each time. "Evil Villain hell bent on revenge - causes massive death and destruction with lots of explosions!"

Until Star Trek comes back to TV, we are going to have to ignore Gene's vision and tolerate the same movie over and over again.
Didn't Star Trek Into Darkness have both a message (quite explicitly slamming America's use of drone weapons) and morals (Kirk deciding to bring Khan to Earth for trial instead of executing him from afar)? Yet you still claim it's not real Star Trek. What will it take?

The Wormhole September 14 2013 03:22 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
If I like it, it's real Star Trek. If I don't like it, it's not real Star Trek.

RandyS September 14 2013 03:23 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
Quote:

CommishSleer wrote: (Post 8643679)
Can someone explain GR's vision concisely so I can judge properly which pieces of 'alleged' Star Trek conform? :)

Dollar signs. Money.

The rest is just hype.

RandyS September 14 2013 03:24 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
Quote:

BillJ wrote: (Post 8643721)
Only The Cage and Threshold are real Star Trek.

You forgot TATV.;)

Nerys Myk September 14 2013 03:30 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
There is good Trek and bad Trek (often subjective), but it is all real Trek.

R. Star September 14 2013 03:32 PM

Re: Not real Star Trek
 
When people say something isn't "real" Trek... it's usually just them venting their own opinions about what they personally do or don't like in an attempt to get others to think like they do. Nerys got it right... there's good and bad, but it's all as real as a fictional setting gets.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.