The Trek BBS

The Trek BBS (http://www.trekbbs.com/index.php)
-   Star Trek Movies XI+ (http://www.trekbbs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=50)
-   -   Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness (http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=217339)

Shaka Zulu June 20 2013 06:21 PM

Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
Well, not really. But Wil Wheaton has some things to say about the new movie:

Quote:

I could have done without the whole beginning, which felt gratuitous and largely disconnected from the rest of the film to me, but I suppose they needed a way to set up Spock putting the needs of the many ahead of the needs of the one, or the few. I had a very hard time accepting that the Enterprise could sit underwater, but Iím willing to accept it and get over it. The makeup on those aliens was awesome, though.
Quote:

Iíve read a lot of online criticism that Uhura didnít do anything useful and was just there to weep and be weak around Spock. I honestly didnít get that at all. She bravely faces down the fucking Klingons, knowing that sheís risking her life, and then is a badass during the climax when Spock and the ship need her the most. I suppose you can make an argument that she had no business bringing up relationship stuff with Spock in the middle of an important mission, but in a high stress situation maybe things bubbling beneath the surface just come up.
Quote:

So on the other end of the writing-for-women spectrum is the profound failure to do awesome stuff with Doctor Marcus. I was disappointed, and I imagine that there must be deleted scenes that make her much more interesting (I have no problem with Alice Eveís performance. I thought she did a fine job with what they wrote for her). Sheís so goddamn smart, and we know that she ends up inventing the goddamn Genesis device, so itís a huge waste to make her little more than eye candy for Kirk. Putting her in her underwear was embarrassing to me as a member of the Star Trek Family, and served absolutely no purpose other than to make teenage boys feel weird, like when they climb the rope in gym class.
My review of Star Trek Into Darkness

Interesting take on it, although I'm still not getting the outrage over seeing Marcus in her undies.

Sindatur June 20 2013 07:30 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
Quote:

Shaka Zulu wrote: (Post 8275432)
Well, not really. But Wil Wheaton has some things to say about the new movie:

Quote:

I could have done without the whole beginning, which felt gratuitous and largely disconnected from the rest of the film to me, but I suppose they needed a way to set up Spock putting the needs of the many ahead of the needs of the one, or the few. I had a very hard time accepting that the Enterprise could sit underwater, but Iím willing to accept it and get over it. The makeup on those aliens was awesome, though.
Quote:

Iíve read a lot of online criticism that Uhura didnít do anything useful and was just there to weep and be weak around Spock. I honestly didnít get that at all. She bravely faces down the fucking Klingons, knowing that sheís risking her life, and then is a badass during the climax when Spock and the ship need her the most. I suppose you can make an argument that she had no business bringing up relationship stuff with Spock in the middle of an important mission, but in a high stress situation maybe things bubbling beneath the surface just come up.
Quote:

So on the other end of the writing-for-women spectrum is the profound failure to do awesome stuff with Doctor Marcus. I was disappointed, and I imagine that there must be deleted scenes that make her much more interesting (I have no problem with Alice Eveís performance. I thought she did a fine job with what they wrote for her). Sheís so goddamn smart, and we know that she ends up inventing the goddamn Genesis device, so itís a huge waste to make her little more than eye candy for Kirk. Putting her in her underwear was embarrassing to me as a member of the Star Trek Family, and served absolutely no purpose other than to make teenage boys feel weird, like when they climb the rope in gym class.
My review of Star Trek Into Darkness

Interesting take on it, although I'm still not getting the outrage over seeing Marcus in her undies.

Agreed. I see absolutely no difference between the Catsuits Troi, Kira, Seven, and T'Pol wore comapred to Doctor Marcus in her underwear, except Doctor Marcus was in her underwear for only a minute, whreas the rest of them live in their cat suits. Additionally, the cat suits often showed shining headlights and were so snug around the lady parts, you could see outlines, I don't recall either of these being true with Doctor Marcus' underwear (Though, Kira's is definitely the least offensive of the Cat Suits). oh, and yes, Doctor Marcus you could see her navel, but, I recall a time or two the catsuits were so snug, they outlined a navel.

JamesRye June 20 2013 07:54 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
I like Wil Wheaton, I think his review is pretty spot on. The local independent cinema here in Exeter UK is going to be screening Stand By Me this weekend and I plan to get all nostalgic and pay a trip to see it.

I'm pleased that he articulates why Gene would be proud of this new movie. I'd like Mr Burton to better articulate his gripes - maybe he was in a bad mood or something when he complained that it lacked .... Gene Roddenberry's touch.

My ST:ID review:

http://ryesofthegeek.wordpress.com/2...s-film-review/

Jax June 20 2013 08:02 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
Quote:

I had a very hard time accepting that the Enterprise could sit underwater
Its a mobile AIRTIGHT ship, I don't understand the reaction to the water bit from some sections.

Enterprise is Great June 20 2013 10:03 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
If it can survive in space why not underwater? I just don't get this objection other than people just do not like seeing the ship underwater for whatever reason.

JamesRye June 20 2013 10:36 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
Yup- and there is a precedent. Voyager went through fluidic space!

I don't get why people had a problem with the big-E under water either. They couldn't beam through the atmosphere, so they went through the atmosphere to the middle of the ocean (where no one would see them) and then moved a bit closer to the land masses.

simples :techman:

Kevman7987 June 20 2013 10:41 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
Quote:

Enterprise is Great wrote: (Post 8276524)
If it can survive in space why not underwater? I just don't get this objection other than people just do not like seeing the ship underwater for whatever reason.

Quote:

JamesRye wrote: (Post 8276791)
Yup- and there is a precedent. Voyager went through fluidic space!

I don't get why people had a problem with the big-E under water either. They couldn't beam through the atmosphere, so they went through the atmosphere to the middle of the ocean (where no one would see them) and then moved a bit closer to the land masses.

simples :techman:

I don't understand this either. My Star Trek Micro Machines survived many a mission in the bathtub without any sort of damage. :techman:

Third Nacelle June 21 2013 01:06 AM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
I have to disagree with Mr. Wheaton on the beginning of the movie. To me, the mission to Niburu felt more like Star Trek than any other part of either of the new films.

Maybe hiding the ship underwater is a bit silly, but so was hiding a holoship underwater, or taking the Delta Flyer into that ocean planet. In general, I would not think that something designed to hold in a lot of internal pressure in a vacuum would do very well with a lot of external pressure, but I'm not going to judge 23rd-century tech.

OpenMaw June 21 2013 04:17 AM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
Quote:

Sindatur wrote: (Post 8275747)
Agreed. I see absolutely no difference between the Catsuits Troi, Kira, Seven, and T'Pol wore comapred to Doctor Marcus in her underwear, except Doctor Marcus was in her underwear for only a minute, whreas the rest of them live in their cat suits. Additionally, the cat suits often showed shining headlights and were so snug around the lady parts, you could see outlines, I don't recall either of these being true with Doctor Marcus' underwear (Though, Kira's is definitely the least offensive of the Cat Suits). oh, and yes, Doctor Marcus you could see her navel, but, I recall a time or two the catsuits were so snug, they outlined a navel.

Yes, but, who honestly liked the catsuits? I honestly found it disconcerting that a show which enjoyed patting itself on the back for being progressive kept reusing the same hook to get the young boys drooling.

As such, i'll take Saavik with her hair down any day. :cool:

Opus June 21 2013 04:38 AM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
Quote:

OpenMaw wrote: (Post 8278519)
Yes, but, who honestly liked the catsuits?

Brannon Braga

Spock/Uhura Fan June 21 2013 05:08 AM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
He "read a lot of online criticism that Uhura didn’t do anything useful and was just there to weep and be weak around Spock" because it's true. And that's the milder criticism of how poorly her character was portrayed and the S/U relationship in general which was so great in the first film.

Aside from the underwear scene, Marcus was treated better than Uhura was in my opinion, but neither got great treatment from my view.

General_Phoenix June 21 2013 05:11 AM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
The problem with the Enterprise being under water (for me..anyway) is it's never really explained why it is there, we just have to accept that it's just..well..under water. Why not simply be in orbit like any other mission? Why risk exposing a primitive society to an advanced technological achievement like the Enterprise? There are tons of questions, but I guess in the end we just have to accept the fact is was there for a cool shot of the Enterprise coming out from an ocean.

CaptainDave1701 June 21 2013 01:15 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
So why are we giving credit to the opinion of Sheldon Cooper's mortal enemy here....

As for what he thought was wrong with the film perhaps he should he should dissect his own body of work in The Next Generation. He is somewhat the Jar Jar Binks of that era.:guffaw:

AllStarEntprise June 21 2013 01:30 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
Quote:

Spock/Uhura Fan wrote: (Post 8278672)
Aside from the underwear scene, Marcus was treated better than Uhura was in my opinion, but neither got great treatment from my view.

Remember Uhura had an underwear scene with Kirk in ST09. I suppose in the Abramsverse strong women characters must first be degraded to being seen in their undercloths. Le sigh:shrug:

CommishSleer June 21 2013 01:50 PM

Re: Wesley Crusher reviews Star Trek Into Darkness
 
I hope Wil Wheaton was embarressed by the 'firm boob' scene in INS.

That was his 'mother' :lol:

Still I think he does have a point about Marcus' intelligence. She was Spock's scientific peer in TWOK. I hope she has more scientific things to do in the next movie.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.