The Trek BBS

The Trek BBS (http://www.trekbbs.com/index.php)
-   Deep Space Nine (http://www.trekbbs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   function of Cardassian armour? (http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=205108)

Dal Rassak March 4 2013 03:36 PM

function of Cardassian armour?
 
That metal carapace is a bit of a medieval piece of kit for the 24th century! It's not like anyone except a Klingon would come at you with a bladed weapon anymore so what exactly is it meant to protect against?
O.k., I know, I know, it's obviously design - makes the uniform look more sleek and threatening. But they could at have tossed in some nominal explanation of why s.th. so archaic-seeming is necessary. Say, if it was some special alloy or something that had the effect of partially deflecting/lessening the impact of phaser fire, now that'd make some sense...

Gul Re'jal March 4 2013 03:48 PM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
I always thought it was made of a special material, but not metal.

It would be logical to assume it was to protect the wearer from phaser and disruptor discharges, so the material has the abilities of dissipating such discharges, minimising negative effects on the wearer.

But seeing in the show a dead Cardassian with barely scorched armour and not even a hole... I guess they didn't want to damage expensive props, but the in-universe result is - they had no function.

Still, if I had to theorise, I'd say they were to protect from modern, energy weapons.

SchwEnt March 4 2013 05:16 PM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
It may have no practical function. It could be traditional or ceremonial.

Deranged Nasat March 4 2013 05:18 PM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
Given that it makes the chest of the predominantly male soldiers seem wide and broad, perhaps it intends to symbolise strength and vitality to the populace? After all, the military in Cardassia is also the government, the police force, the emergency supply system, etc. Just as the Cardassian neck is broad and muscular, perhaps Cardassians instinctively associate a broad chest with a dominant male, and the armour is designed to reflect that? Authority, leadership, attractive vitality? Even a sense of inclusion for the lower-status males who inevitably form the majority of an army - "no-one is left behind in the Cardassian Union - all men are respected and admired for their service!"

Dal Rassak March 4 2013 05:48 PM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
It makes absolute sense that the look of the uniform is partially intended to emphasize and flatter the male physique. That still doesn't explain the practical function of using metal (of course it's all rubber but the look the costume designers have given it very much suggests that the material is meant to be metallic).

Gul Re'jal March 4 2013 06:08 PM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
Metallic? I never had that impression. Wrong colour, wrong texture, the presence of flexibility, no metallic sound when hit but more of a dull thump.

Why do you think it's metallic?

Iliana Malek March 4 2013 06:08 PM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
I was always under the impression that the armour was some sort of special material, as well, lightweight to wear, but still protective. Considering how little it actually protected its wearers, the wearing of it could be completely ceremonial. Of course, it could also be that the species that the Union had to passify before we see them for the first time on Trek had inferior weapons, and the material the armour was made of actually did serve as adequate protection, but then, we see many Cardassian soldiers taken out by Cardassian weapons, sooo....yeah. :p

Perhaps it was originally designed to protect against hand-to-hand, ground combat situations, and the design simply never really evolved to adequately protect against energy weapons. It may serve to dissipate a blast somewhat, but it's still no match for higher energy charges.

_C_ March 5 2013 12:03 AM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
It's that way because Tim Gunn visited Cardassia. :P

Nerys Ghemor March 5 2013 12:06 AM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
In my writing it is a memory material that serves two functions: to deflect shrapnel (which is still a risk in the 24th century just as it is in modern warfare--being impaled by flying debris can kill you or give you an infection just as easily as a burn wound or a shock), and to partially absorb energy blasts. Its function in the latter regard is incomplete, though, and it is still possible to burn through it or alternately deliver a shock so powerful that it still reaches the body even though the armor may seem to be serving its function. An imperfect defense, but still better than Starfleet's nothing.

TheRoyalFamily March 6 2013 01:35 AM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
Considering ships' shields barely were effective in DS9 (they only mattered for plot reasons), it's no surprise that personal armor of any sort was completely ineffective as well.

Gul Re'jal March 6 2013 03:44 AM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
Nothing annoys me more than assuming that everything created by adversaries of the Federation is useless ;) Especially the Cardassians ;)

I don't think armour was useless, but I think the writers didn't really give a thought why it looked the way it did and didn't use the opportunity to make it something different.

Iliana Malek March 6 2013 04:09 AM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
^This

They made it almost seem too unbelievable when we meet Cardassians for the first time, too. A single Nebula class ship takes out several Galor class warships, and we're supposed to believe that there's been a war going on for the past few years? The Cardassians were made to seem way too weak in their first introduction. They remedied that a bit in DS9, but they still seemed to favour showing the Federation as having markedly superior technology.

Nerys Ghemor March 6 2013 06:12 AM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
I've always figured that while the Federation did have superior technology than the Cardassians due to a combination of superior resources and a freer society, the Cardassians had superior discipline and tactics--better use of what they did have--that made them on par with the Federation in combat.

Deranged Nasat March 6 2013 11:13 AM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
Quote:

Nerys Ghemor wrote: (Post 7766473)
I've always figured that while the Federation did have superior technology than the Cardassians due to a combination of superior resources and a freer society, the Cardassians had superior discipline and tactics--better use of what they did have--that made them on par with the Federation in combat.

Agreed.

After all, combat is simply one of many duties for the Federation Starfleet, not their primary concern. While I'm sure many of the enlisted security personnel are first and foremost defenders, the Starfleet as a whole is geared towards exploration, science, diplomacy and peacekeeping, with a mandate for defence on top of it. Cardassian soldiers are soldiers first, anything else second. I don't think it's strange to suggest they'd be well trained enough to hold their own.

And for what it's worth, the Talarians managed to hold their own too, at least in a short border conflict, despite their ships being about two hundred years behind the Federation's in terms of technology, so in the Star Trek setting technology most certainly isn't everything (as in reality, of course).

King Daniel Into Darkness March 6 2013 12:37 PM

Re: function of Cardassian armour?
 
Quote:

function of Cardassian armour?
It would seem the armour was designed to impale the wearer's privates if they sat down.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.