The Trek BBS

The Trek BBS (http://www.trekbbs.com/index.php)
-   Future of Trek (http://www.trekbbs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   star trek 3 without jjabrams (http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=201460)

tmosler January 25 2013 05:27 AM

star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
By know youve probly heard that jj abrams has went agienst what he said befoure about not directing the new star wars movie out of loyalty to trek.
So do to abrams directing the new star wars movie theres a big chance he will not direct the 3rd star trek movie. So i was just wondering what people here think about him not being in the 3rd star trek movie i think its good news because now paromunt might actually get a director who likes star trek to fill his spot.

Admiral Buzzkill January 25 2013 05:30 AM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Abrams will probably direct the third Star Trek movie - I certainly hope that he does - but if not he'll remain as executive producer, closely supervising the making of the film. It will be made to his taste; Paramount is completely supportive of his take on Star Trek because it's succeeding.

Bry_Sinclair January 25 2013 10:16 AM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Temis the Vorta January 25 2013 06:10 PM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
If Abrams isnt available and willing, Paramount will get another director, sure, but they could very well get one who likes Star Trek less (if by which you mean having a slavish devotion to canon or any individual's personal definition of what Star Trek is.)

Do you think all directors are in love with the subject matter before they make a movie, vs wanting to put their own stamp on it? But the bigger factor is the narrow range of what is considered acceptable anymore in a summer tentpole movie. Many of the complaints I've seen about Abrams' Star Trek movies are actually complaints about how movies are now, in general, and any director is going to be subject to those same constraints.

The Mirrorball Man January 25 2013 06:15 PM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Quote:

Bry_Sinclair wrote: (Post 7588669)
So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Those lens flares jokes haven't lost their edge.

Ronald Held January 25 2013 08:56 PM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Maybe a different director would help a little? Or after the 3d movie he will bail to make more SW movies?

YARN January 25 2013 10:39 PM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Quote:

The Mirrorball Man wrote: (Post 7589953)
Quote:

Bry_Sinclair wrote: (Post 7588669)
So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Those lens flares jokes haven't lost their edge.

Neither have those lens flares in the 09 film.

Admiral Buzzkill January 25 2013 10:46 PM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Quote:

Bry_Sinclair wrote: (Post 7588669)
So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Would that be wise? It might startle the audience, after all, and after the prequels I'm not sure Star Wars fans can accustom themselves to any excitement.

lurok January 25 2013 10:54 PM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
http://i1206.photobucket.com/albums/...8ck1o1_500.png

bigdaddy January 26 2013 12:43 AM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
I hope JJ Abrams doesn't do another Star Trek, I have no clue how they plan on him doing a Star Wars movie in two years. Took his time making the second of his Star Trek movies after delaying and delaying and waiting until the last possible minute. I'd fire him and have a new Star Trek movie come out in 2015 too, have a new battle.

Admiral Buzzkill January 26 2013 12:47 AM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Yeah, so Star Wars can bury Star Trek. That's not a battle, that's a massacre.

No, thank you.

I hope Abrams does do another Star Trek. He's going to be in charge of it, whether he directs or not.

Enterprise is Great January 26 2013 01:10 AM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Quote:

bigdaddy wrote: (Post 7591879)
I hope JJ Abrams doesn't do another Star Trek, I have no clue how they plan on him doing a Star Wars movie in two years. Took his time making the second of his Star Trek movies after delaying and delaying and waiting until the last possible minute..

Easy. The script for Episode 7 is being written right now from a George Lucas treatment. Abrams had to start from stratch with STiD so it's a different situation.

Mirror Sulu January 30 2013 03:20 AM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Quote:

The Mirrorball Man wrote: (Post 7589953)
Quote:

Bry_Sinclair wrote: (Post 7588669)
So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Those lens flares jokes haven't lost their edge.

With all that blinding lens flare, the Stormtroopers will never be able to shoot anything.

R. Star January 30 2013 03:23 AM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
Quote:

Mirror Sulu wrote: (Post 7613317)
Quote:

The Mirrorball Man wrote: (Post 7589953)
Quote:

Bry_Sinclair wrote: (Post 7588669)
So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Those lens flares jokes haven't lost their edge.

With all that blinding lens flare, the Stormtroopers will never be able to shoot anything.

Not like they ever could before.

Though anyone wonder if Berman and Braga are just hopefully waiting for their phones to ring? :p

Admiral Buzzkill January 30 2013 03:34 AM

Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams
 
No.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.