The Trek BBS

The Trek BBS (
-   Trek Literature (
-   -   Rate 2012 in Trek lit (

King Daniel Beyond January 3 2013 03:47 PM

Rate 2012 in Trek lit
I thought it might be fun to get ratings and opinions on Trek lit overall in 2012. IMO it was a great one for Trek. I haven't bought/read them all, but all the ones I did I enjoyed.

zarkon January 3 2013 04:26 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
Looking at the Best Trek novel of 2012 choices, I can't really say its been a great year from my perspective.

Ood Sigma January 3 2013 04:29 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
Voted Above Average. A couple less-than-stellar ones but some that were simply amazing (The Persistence of Memory and the DRG3 Typhon Pact duology).

Relayer1 January 3 2013 05:40 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
With Plagues of Night, Raise The Dawn and the Cold Equations trilogy all being right up there with my very favourite Trek novels, I've got to say outstanding.

There are certainly other books I don't care for so much, but that's inevitable.

shanejayell January 3 2013 06:55 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
Pretty much agree with the above posters. A good but not great year, with a clunker novel and a few good ones, mixed with a couple of outstanding ones.

Voted above average.

Thrawn January 4 2013 03:30 AM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
I think it's been pretty clearly the best TrekLit year since 2008 and Destiny. Fallen Gods was my only real disappointment this year; everything else worked for me. Raise The Dawn was the only genuinely shocking novel - the rest played to the various strengths of those series/authors in much the way you'd expect, but that isn't a bad thing.

Very solid year.

Enterpriserules January 4 2013 01:41 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
I believe with Beyer's The Eternal Tide, DRGIII DS9 books and Chris' DTI book this has been one of Trek's strongest years in, well years! Like Thrawn the only huge disappointment for me was Fallen Gods, which I just did not resonate with at all.

Warp Coil January 4 2013 05:43 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
I voted Above Average. Some fantastic installments - notably DRGIII's duology and Mack's Cold Equations trilogy. Other good entries include DTI: Forgotten History and TP: Brinkmanship. VOY: The Eternal Tide was certainly controversial (and slightly disappointing). Fallen Gods was another disappointing installment for Titan.

TJ Sinclair January 6 2013 10:38 AM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
Okay, so I'm playing catch up on a lot of titles. I'll get working on Plagues of Night in a couple of days, soon as I finish Indistinguishable from Magic. Sad to hear that most people didn't like Fallen Gods, as I was kinda looking forward to that, since overall I like the Titan series, but then I'm fairly behind on it. I've read Seize the Fire and liked it okay, but the last actual Titan book I read before that was Sword of Damocles...

Mage January 6 2013 10:51 AM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
Ups and downs really. DRGIII and David Mack rocked, Christopher's DTI novel was very good (although I liked the first one better).
Una's novel was so and so to me, it wasn't as strong as The Neverending Sacrifice. Fallen Gods was down right dirty and nasty. The Eternal Tide.... I said it before, I'll say it again, time for a reread. Didn't like the way Janeway was brought back and how Eden was bumped out of the series. I started to like Eden really.
I didn't read the TOS novels this year, not a big fan of TOS really. But I might try some of the TOS novels this year, since Vanguard really got me into that particulair era of Trek.

So yeah, above average I guess. Mostly thanks to DRGIII, Mack and Bennett.

JWolf January 6 2013 10:31 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit

King Daniel wrote: (Post 7482148)
I thought it might be fun to get ratings and opinions on Trek lit overall in 2012. IMO it was a great one for Trek. I haven't bought/read them all, but all the ones I did I enjoyed.

Where is the option for better then above average and yet, not outstanding? Some of the books in 2012 pulled the rating down from less then outstanding, but overall, better then above average.

If need be, I can create a new poll if you can't get this one fixed and then reset so everyone gets to vote again.

Thrawn January 6 2013 10:42 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
^ I would just vote Above Average. All of the Lit polls have had this same set of options for a few years, at this point, so going to huge efforts to change this one seems unnecessary.

If we had "Outstanding", "Excellent", and "Above Average", someone would eventually complain that the book wasn't outstanding or excellent, but was certainly better than merely above average...

This essentially equates to something like's one-to-five stars, just with descriptions to better normalize everyone's choices. Seems fine to me.

Relayer1 January 6 2013 10:44 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
For me, its always going to be some I like and some I don't. I'd say any year would struggle to make the above average category, and I'd only expect one or two truly great Trek novels.

This year I had five - two from DRGIII and three from Mr Mack, so its an outstanding year. That there were a few other good novels like Christopher's was a bonus.

Christopher January 6 2013 10:59 PM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
And for what it's worth, Excellent is above Average. It's just a lot above it.

JD January 7 2013 12:55 AM

Re: Rate 2012 in Trek lit
I've always considered pretty much anything above Above Average to be outstanding. I guess that's the problem these kinds of polls, everybody has their own definition of what the options mean.

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.