![]() |
100 Year Starship Management group picked
Per MSNBC
Quote:
So we can start building the thing then? or are we waiting for appropriate tech to be developed? |
Re: 100 Year Starship Management group picked
The answer to your question is in the name of the thread.
|
Re: 100 Year Starship Management group picked
Quote:
The DARPA 100 Year Starship thread http://www.100yss.org/index.html |
Re: 100 Year Starship Management group picked
This is a good site for options: http://www.projectrho.com/public_htm...enginelist.php
Smoother than the nuclear pulse orion concept is the Nuclear Salt Water Rocket http://www.projectrho.com/public_htm...t-water_Rocket Its fringe-worthy--but look how well it does with a 90% solution on this graph: www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/images/enginelist/rocketChart.jpg Best yet: The advantage of NSWR is that this is the only known propulsion system that combines high exhaust velocity with high thrust. Thrust 13,000,000 newtons with 4,700,000 m/s exhaust velocity--a one two punch! NTR DUMBO looks more do-able http://www.projectrho.com/public_htm...TR-SOLID/DUMBO This would provide 3,500,000 newtons thrust Now imagine you use that in place of a Centaur upper stage, and have AIMSTAR as a payload: http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/P...AIMStar_99.pdf This would provide 598,000 m/s exhaust velocity. This alone would allow a trip to 10,000 AU in 50 years. Couple this with DUMBO NTR to get most of its useful life extra-solar--NOW you have a souped up New Horizons. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.