![]() |
Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Thanks to my being a persistent nuisance to Bjo Trimble :D, work will begin shortly on a new edition of the venerable Star Trek Concordance. It'll probably be strictly a pay-for-download basis, but I'm gonna see if maybe the prospects for a hardcopy version might be a little less dire than is currently believed.
Comments and questions are welcome. |
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
I hope the updates include referents to the new movie. :)
|
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Judging by the last edition of the Concordance (which included entries for episodes like "Unification" and "Blood Oath"), I would assume that a new edition would have entries for anything made since then which includes TOS characters--which does include the new movie, of course. :)
|
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Then the punishment fits the crime. :lol:
|
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Don't count on much regarding the new movie. Nothing lines up with anything outside of that abominable film, so if there is any mention, it will be in its own, self-contained section, safely away from the rest of the Star Trek universe.
Just like the film itself. :devil: |
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Quote:
If you think the movie's abominable and shouldn't be included, you're on the wrong track already -- first, because it was far from abominable, and second, because a lot of people saw it and may be interested in something that discusses it. But then, I assume you want people to buy it. I may be wrong. |
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
If one were to include or exclude parts of the TOS canon based on perceived quality, that would suggest the omission of things like "The Alternative Factor," much of the third season, and ST V. A reference book is supposed to be comprehensive and objective, not narrow and partisan.
|
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Quote:
I'd love to hear what Bjo thinks of the new film, good or bad. And I hope she does away with the nonsensical 'cosmos' section and sticks all the planets in the main Ency. |
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Yeah, the Lexicon in the '90s edition was dreadfully organized.
Then again, if this edition ends up online, its index could be much more easily searched. |
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Quote:
|
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Quote:
|
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
The Spock from TOS would, immediately upon discovering that he was in a past time period, begin his calculations for a time warp, to get to a point in order to repair whatever damage has occurred and restore the damaged timeline. This Spock does none of that. Logic dictates that this is not the same Spock.
|
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Quote:
It's not unreasonable to presume Old Spock knew this (since Young Spock deduced it on his own) and knew it would be futile to try. |
Re: Star Trek Concordance -- One More Time!
Exactly. Spock Prime didn't go back in time as much as he went sideways into an alternate universe. Travelling up or down the Abramverse timeline would have repaired nothing, nor would it send him home. Spock knew this, and he made the most of his situation by influencing what few events he could.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.