The Trek BBS

The Trek BBS (http://www.trekbbs.com/index.php)
-   TV & Media (http://www.trekbbs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=28)
-   -   Simpson poses nude for Playboy (http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=105500)

Chris3123 October 9 2009 06:44 PM

Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
No, not Jessica Simpson. Not even Ashley Simpson.








Marge Simpson. I kid you not.

Here's the cover: (don't worry mods, no naughty bits shown)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...rgeplayboy.jpg

:wtf:




Oh, BTW, from the article:

Quote:

New CEO Scott Flanders said the idea is to attract readers in their 20s to a magazine where the average reader's age is 35.
Heh.

tharpdevenport October 9 2009 06:46 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
If this is real, and any guy here buys it and wanks off to it ... you shouldn't be allowed to have a penis.

M October 9 2009 06:59 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
You know, I wish some people weren't allowed to post their nonsense. :rolleyes:

Zion Ravescene October 9 2009 07:04 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
It's not like we haven't seen her naked of course. Oh, wait...

Interestingly... this part of the article makes a bit of a mockery of this here thread title:
Quote:

Marge isn't going to bare all, though, as the magazine said there will only be "implied nudity" in the three-page pictorial.
"Implied.... or implode?" :lol: [Mom, make him stop! - Lisa]

Robert Maxwell October 9 2009 07:09 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
http://gorzek.com/emo/picard_facepalm.jpg

Kegg October 9 2009 07:10 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
So, this is the market strategy:

Attract younger customers by showing nearly-naked pictures of a cartoon woman for cash, when those people could just as easily get more graphic porn of the same woman for free on the internet (should they, you know, be so inclined.)

Am I missing something here? Is it the sheer novelty factor that's supposed to spur that impulse buying?

Starbreaker October 9 2009 07:28 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
Quote:

NCC-1701 wrote: (Post 3473828)
You know, I wish some people weren't allowed to post their nonsense. :rolleyes:

Did you find this offensive or something?

iguana_tonante October 9 2009 07:31 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
I think it's funny. :confused:

M October 9 2009 07:34 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
Quote:

Starbreaker wrote: (Post 3473924)
Did you find this offensive or something?

Not at all. I actually think it's a rather cute idea. That was just my reaction to the non-sequitur of the preceding poster.

TemporalFlux October 9 2009 07:39 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
And in the next issue box:

Quote:

Bare Naked Ladies!
But all you get is this.

SeerSGB October 9 2009 07:45 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
Rule 34 man, Rule 34

Of course we all know Lois Griffin would go all the way. none of this "implied" nudity BS

Quote:

TharpDevilport wrote: (Post 3473794)
If this is real, and any guy here buys it and wanks off to it ... you shouldn't be allowed to have a penis.

You know someone will.

Robert Maxwell October 9 2009 07:50 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
Quote:

Kegg wrote: (Post 3473860)
So, this is the market strategy:

Attract younger customers by showing nearly-naked pictures of a cartoon woman for cash, when those people could just as easily get more graphic porn of the same woman for free on the internet (should they, you know, be so inclined.)

Am I missing something here? Is it the sheer novelty factor that's supposed to spur that impulse buying?

Yeah, the folks are Playboy are failing to understand why their wares don't appeal to the under-30 crowd.

Nobody wants to pay for porn when they can get it free on the Internet!

SeerSGB October 9 2009 07:57 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
Well there is more to Playboy than that...used to be anyway. Good lord Ray Bardbury and Asimov both have wrote for the magazine-- for an example. Playboy has, for the most part, always been about the "Playboy lifestyle" and people aren't interested in that much anymore.

sidious618 October 9 2009 08:05 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
I was really hoping it'd be Jessica Simpson but since it just had Simpson in the title I had a feeling there was a twist coming.

Admiral Buzzkill October 9 2009 08:26 PM

Re: Simpson poses nude for Playboy
 
Quote:

TheGallifreyanSith wrote: (Post 3473984)
Of course we all know Lois Griffin would go all the way. none of this "implied" nudity BS

Lois Griffin would be on Brazzers.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.