The Trek BBS

The Trek BBS (http://www.trekbbs.com/index.php)
-   Science Fiction & Fantasy (http://www.trekbbs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Are "Dolls" slaves? (http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=104226)

The Borgified Corpse September 22 2009 05:17 AM

Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
One of the recurring points on Dollhouse is that many people assert that the Actives are slaves. Even if they volunteered for it, they say no one can sign a contract that makes them a slave.

I would disagree that the Actives are slaves at all, at least not in principle. (There is evidence in "Echoes" that at least some Actives were extorted into joining. It seems that if the Rossum Corporation catches someone snooping too close to one of their secret projects, they offer them a choice of a 5 year contract with the Dollhouse or bringing them up on criminal charges.) But lets assume that, aside from a few unsavory exceptions, most Actives joined the Dollhouse willingly. Are they slaves?

I would argue that they're no more slaves than any other working person. All they are doing is leasing the use of their body to the Dollhouse for a substantial monetary fee. Are the Actives made to do things they would not otherwise do? Sure, but so does pretty much everyone. I'm sure a cashier would rather be doing something else but they do it because they are paid to and they prefer working over starving.

So why the consistent references to slavery? A slave is someone who is owned by someone else and does not benefit from the fruits of their own labor. If the Actives volunteer, are paid well, and get their bodies back after the contract expires, how can they be slaves?

MeanJoePhaser September 22 2009 06:01 AM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
Yes. They are. A normal worker has a choice, they aren't kept in a child like stupor and then programmed to be something they had choice in. In fact, they are almost the perfect slave, as they can forget all their hardships.

The Borgified Corpse September 22 2009 06:16 AM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
But they chose to be temporarily put into that childlike stupor.

Asbo Zaprudder September 22 2009 06:57 AM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
I realised the other day that Dollhouse is Joe 90 with tits. Echo even wears his specs at one stage in Ghost. ;)
Joe 90 was even creepier given that the father was programming his son -- perhaps an extrapolation of how parents fcuk up their children (as Philip Larkin put it in This Be The Verse).

IMO the dolls are slaves in that their mental state prevents them from opting out.

Checkmate September 22 2009 08:41 AM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
Quote:

The Borgified Corpse wrote: (Post 3420370)
But they chose to be temporarily put into that childlike stupor.

So?

And, actually, they were indentured into it through contracts and promises that they have absolutely no way of making sure are kept. The contracts may as well have been written on toliet paper. This is proven all the more in the beloved (even though it just made me roll my eyes -- to each their own) episode, Epitaph One. You know, where the company just spontaneously decides to sell them as new bodies for the wealthy.

They're slaves. Mindless ones at that. Zero question about it.

Yoda September 22 2009 10:09 AM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
I didn't buy indentured servitude = slavery stuff in grade school history and I don't buy it here.

Admiral Buzzkill September 22 2009 02:44 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
Yes, they are.

Dusty Ayres September 22 2009 02:47 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
Quote:

Yoda wrote: (Post 3420707)
I didn't buy indentured servitude = slavery stuff in grade school history and I don't buy it here.

Then your history teacher was incompetent, and you need to read some black history books, or ones that are off the beaten track:rolleyes:

intrinsical September 22 2009 03:01 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
I voted yes mainly because actives have no way to "opt out" of their contract. And like someone said above, the company can simply keep actives around long past their contracted period of servitude quite simply because the actives would have no recollection of the contract, or its duration.

Lindley September 22 2009 03:02 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
Yes, but I can understand how the people in charge might fool themselves into thinking otherwise.

Captain Craig September 22 2009 04:29 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
For the question: are they slaves? To some degree they allowed themselves into that. They knew going in they couldn't "opt" out. Some like Alpha who were prison inmates recruited I could see as more slaves than those who agreed, either willingly or under duress.
To me this question is what makes shows like this good. Some moral ambiguity to make us all think and rethink what we believe we already know as definitions for things.

My main answer: NO

Quote:

intrinsical wrote: (Post 3421014)
I voted yes mainly because actives have no way to "opt out" of their contract. And like someone said above, the company can simply keep actives around long past their contracted period of servitude quite simply because the actives would have no recollection of the contract, or its duration.

I don't recall off hand now but did Millie/November seem to act as if she knew Adelle and had fulfilled her contract at the season close? I know I don't recall her, at the point we come into the conversation, acting weirded out by what was going on.

I have a thought on that scene: Spoiler

Yoda September 22 2009 07:27 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
OMG if you sign a contract to be a soldier, then you try to 'opt-out' they thrown you in jail. WTF SLAVERY OHNOES!!!1!

Alpha_Geek September 22 2009 07:31 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
To quote Rush (the band),

"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."

Yoda September 22 2009 07:38 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
Quote:

Dusty Ayres wrote: (Post 3420996)
Quote:

Yoda wrote: (Post 3420707)
I didn't buy indentured servitude = slavery stuff in grade school history and I don't buy it here.

Then your history teacher was incompetent, and you need to read some black history books, or ones that are off the beaten track:rolleyes:

:guffaw:

Except that indentured servitude was the mechanism by which the majority of Europeans emigrated from Europe back in ye olden tymes. They weren't slaves. Exploited in many instances, sure! But not every exploited person in the world is a slave... sorry. If anything trying to equate the two downplays slavery of blacks in America.

Tomato September 22 2009 07:54 PM

Re: Are "Dolls" slaves?
 
Quote:

Yoda wrote: (Post 3421873)
OMG if you sign a contract to be a soldier, then you try to 'opt-out' they thrown you in jail. WTF SLAVERY OHNOES!!!1!

But you know what you are doing and you still have a choice in your actions 100% of the time. And that is still a choice to be thrown in jail, you must have consciously disobeyed some command.

Like these Dolls are being rented out as high class escorts has anybody even bother testing the dolls or even the people that rent them out? They are always being forced to do more and more dangerous things.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.