The Trek BBS

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, register for your free account. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Internal Hails > TrekToday News Items

TrekToday News Items Discussion of TrekToday news items

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 1 2008, 11:46 PM   #1
TrekToday
Rear Admiral
 
'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

Too much focus on unimportant details is a sign of a need for a franchise revitalization according to Star Trek XI Producer Damon Lindelof.

As reported by Amctv.com, when the show becomes more about the details then the characters, it's time for a change. "I think it's like how with 'Batman,' it got to the point where there was more press about the nipples on the Batsuit than there was about the characters, and the franchise needed a reboot," said Lindelof.

But Lindelof had respect for Star Trek and its lengthy past. "I had a real reverence for the material, but more importantly, for the world and how special that world is, and how long it's persevered," he explained. "I watched a fair amount of the original and I really watched a lot of 'Next Generation.' The first series of meetings we had were along the lines of: What is the 'State of the Union' of Trek, and has it been brought to a place where people will resent our involvement because we're coming from the outside?"

In addition to the franchise, Lindelof has to deal with expectations and concerns from actors who were involved with the original Star Trek. One of them, William Shatner, was disappointed to not be included in Star Trek XI. "Mr. Shatner created Kirk, so I understand and sympathize with his feelings about what his role, or lack of a role, in our movie was," said Lindelof. "That being said, Kirk died. He fell down a cliff face. That made it incredibly challenging for us to tell the story we wanted to tell and figure out a way for William Shatner, who is now several years older than Kirk was when he died, to be in the movie. It's an incredibly ambitious movie on a technical scale. I can say with confidence that we achieved what we set out to achieve, and that's all you can ask for."

To read more, head to the article located here.

TrekToday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 12:38 AM   #2
Dennis
Fleet Admiral
 
Dennis's Avatar
 
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

It certainly did need a reboot, or restart, or whatever imprecise term one wishes to use. Good on Lindelof for just putting that out there.
__________________
"Apple of course does not care what its customers think… they consider us morons at best anyway, but it’s worth a laugh and a shake of your head."- Tom Richmond
Dennis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 01:49 AM   #3
zenophite
Rear Admiral
 
zenophite's Avatar
 
Location: AlphaVerse
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

TrekToday wrote: View Post
The first series of meetings we had were along the lines of: What is the 'State of the Union' of Trek, and has it been brought to a place where people will resent our involvement because we're coming from the outside?"
at which point they all looked at a few printed versions of Trek BBS "Bermaga" threads and said

"how much more hate could we really inspire with just one movie?"
__________________
The reason we have two ears and only one mouth, is that we may hear more and speak less.
- Zeno of Cittium (334-262 BC)
zenophite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 02:18 AM   #4
Garrovick
Vice Admiral
 
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

I'm sorry Mr. Damon Lindelof

You are mistaken

It did not.

It needed some one with imagination to go forward, to continue the saga.

However, your new movie will make a very nice purchase some day from the DVD bargin bin. Might even make the rainy Saturday afternoon DVD rental list from NetFlix.
Garrovick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 02:23 AM   #5
zenophite
Rear Admiral
 
zenophite's Avatar
 
Location: AlphaVerse
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

^wow.
__________________
The reason we have two ears and only one mouth, is that we may hear more and speak less.
- Zeno of Cittium (334-262 BC)
zenophite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 02:31 AM   #6
StarMan
Vice Admiral
 
StarMan's Avatar
 
Location: Waiting In The Sky.
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

Garrovick wrote: View Post
I'm sorry Mr. Damon Lindelof

You are mistaken

It did not.

It needed some one with imagination to go forward, to continue the saga.
Indeed. His name is JJ Abrams and that's precisely what he's doing.

Or are you suggesting the saga can only continue so long as it continues further into the fictional Trek timeline? That to me is a lack of imagination.
__________________
Eat sushi.
StarMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 02:41 AM   #7
Dane_Whitman
Captain
 
Dane_Whitman's Avatar
 
Location: Dinner to bug.
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

*sigh*

After Pegg's "Trek XI is not a reboot", now it's supposed to be a reboot again. Though I think 'reboot' and 'revitalization' are not necessarily the same thing. Guess we'll have to wait to see the picture to be sure, as all involved seem to be contradicting each other.
__________________
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves,
but wiser people so full of doubts."

- Bertrand Russell
Dane_Whitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 02:49 AM   #8
zenophite
Rear Admiral
 
zenophite's Avatar
 
Location: AlphaVerse
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

since they've got time travel and Nimoy in it, it seems obvious that it will be a "in-universe" reboot. Sort of like all those reset button episodes except without that final reset button.
__________________
The reason we have two ears and only one mouth, is that we may hear more and speak less.
- Zeno of Cittium (334-262 BC)
zenophite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 03:03 AM   #9
Broccoli
Rear Admiral
 
Broccoli's Avatar
 
Location: Broccoli
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

TrekToday wrote: View Post
"I think it's like how with 'Batman,' it got to the point where there was more press about the nipples on the Batsuit than there was about the characters, and the franchise needed a reboot," said Lindelof.
So...Batman is in the movie? Awesome!

Dane_Whitman wrote: View Post
*sigh*

After Pegg's "Trek XI is not a reboot", now it's supposed to be a reboot again. Though I think 'reboot' and 'revitalization' are not necessarily the same thing. Guess we'll have to wait to see the picture to be sure, as all involved seem to be contradicting each other.
It's a revitalization of a reboot with repercussions which was initially a rerun, but they rebooted it before revitalizing it which makes the canon rewind until it becomes recanon. Really.
__________________
TrekBBS: Sense of humor NOT ALLOWED!

"Cult It or Can It?" - The 2010 Podcast
Broccoli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 03:41 AM   #10
Garrovick
Vice Admiral
 
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

StarMan wrote: View Post
Garrovick wrote: View Post
I'm sorry Mr. Damon Lindelof

You are mistaken

It did not.

It needed some one with imagination to go forward, to continue the saga.
Indeed. His name is JJ Abrams and that's precisely what he's doing.

Or are you suggesting the saga can only continue so long as it continues further into the fictional Trek timeline? That to me is a lack of imagination.
That's fine, things change..

Just don't expect everyone to support this new vision and allow them their opinions.

My opinion, based on Enterprise and this new movie, Star Trek ended with Nemesis.
Garrovick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 03:49 AM   #11
Dennis
Fleet Admiral
 
Dennis's Avatar
 
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

There was nothing left of Trek worth following up on. A restart/reboot/reimagining/whatever you want to call it is a good thing.
__________________
"Apple of course does not care what its customers think… they consider us morons at best anyway, but it’s worth a laugh and a shake of your head."- Tom Richmond
Dennis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 04:03 AM   #12
Brutal Strudel
Rear Admiral
 
Brutal Strudel's Avatar
 
Location: Inferno
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

Starship Polaris wrote: View Post
There was nothing left of Trek worth following up on. A restart/reboot/reimagining/whatever you want to call it is a good thing.
That's half right.
__________________
Does that make me a bad person? By God, I hope so.
Brutal Strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 04:07 AM   #13
Tom Servo
Commodore
 
Tom Servo's Avatar
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

Well seeing as how trek became so big, expansive and detailed that it was becoming choked with its own facts and canon, a nice fresh outlook on things will be nice to see.
__________________
"I like this ship! It's exciting!"-Scotty "Star Trek"

Member of Red Sox Nation
Tom Servo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 04:34 AM   #14
sidious618
Vice Admiral
 
sidious618's Avatar
 
Location: Long Island, NY, US
Send a message via AIM to sidious618
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

Lindelof is completely correct.
__________________
Dr. Walter Bishop: To understand what happened at the diner, we use Mr. Papaya. [he places the papaya in the container to be blown up and steps back] This is upsetting because he is the friendliest of fruits.
-Fringe
sidious618 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 04:41 AM   #15
Nerys Ghemor
Legate
 
Nerys Ghemor's Avatar
 
Location: Cardăsa Terăm
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

zenophite wrote: View Post
since they've got time travel and Nimoy in it, it seems obvious that it will be a "in-universe" reboot. Sort of like all those reset button episodes except without that final reset button.
Now that really begs the question of what'll happen on the Trek lit front--think we'll get two separate continuities, or a whole hell of a lot of retconning to try and bring the two continuities into line with each other?

I kind of fall in the middle on this issue. I think a new continuity could be a very interesting thing and possibly even worthwhile as far as creating a successful movie and a show that will attract new fans.

On the other hand, I think the current continuity works very well as the basis for literature (both official lit AND unofficial fanfic). Not being under the same degree of time and budgetary pressures that a movie is, there's no reason, especially with resources like Memory Alpha and Beta available, that an author cannot do the research to work within the existing continuity. The intricacy is now very well suited to the written format, much like the extreme detail in the Star Wars: Expanded Universe continuity, or Tolkien's Middle Earth.

I personally say it should not have to be an either-or dilemma: why not simply have one "new continuity" for the movie, and officially hand over the old material (ENT, TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, and the prior movies) to the writers at Pocket Book? It seems like it's been working its way in that direction already...let's just make it official.
__________________
Are you a Cardassian fan, citizen? Prove your loyalty--check out my fanfic universe, Star Trek: Sigils and Unions and Sigils and Unions: Catacombs of Oralius!
Nerys Ghemor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 05:01 AM   #16
zenophite
Rear Admiral
 
zenophite's Avatar
 
Location: AlphaVerse
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

^I've never been interested in tie-in literature for entertainment for many reasons so I wouldn't be able to say.
__________________
The reason we have two ears and only one mouth, is that we may hear more and speak less.
- Zeno of Cittium (334-262 BC)
zenophite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 05:57 AM   #17
TJinPgh
Captain
 
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

StarMan wrote: View Post
Garrovick wrote: View Post
I'm sorry Mr. Damon Lindelof

You are mistaken

It did not.

It needed some one with imagination to go forward, to continue the saga.
Indeed. His name is JJ Abrams and that's precisely what he's doing.

Or are you suggesting the saga can only continue so long as it continues further into the fictional Trek timeline? That to me is a lack of imagination.
From what we've bee told about the plot of this movie, there's very little imaginative about it.

Bad guys go back in time to kill our hero before he becomes one.

Sorry, but we've seen that story before. It's called Terminator. Most likely with a bit of Yesterday's Enterprise thrown in.

It's not even new to the Star Trek universe, let alone to movies or Sci-Fi.

Heck, Terminator even managed to find a way to fit Ahnold into the story three times, despite the fact that he dies in every one of them. He also manages to look older each time out, despite the fact that cyborgs don't age.

Yet, a movie with a $150m budget can't manage to do what DirecTV pulled off with Shatner for a fraction of the cost.

In contrast, New Voyages manages to pump out a couple of episodes a year that are far more creative than this, yet does it in a way that pays as much homage to the original as humanly possible without actually having Gene and the original cast there to do it.

Not that I'd likely pay to see that on the big screen either. But, at least their hearts are in the right place.
TJinPgh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 06:03 AM   #18
goldbug
Commodore
 
goldbug's Avatar
 
Location: The Outer Limits
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

Garrovick wrote: View Post
StarMan wrote: View Post
Garrovick wrote: View Post
I'm sorry Mr. Damon Lindelof

You are mistaken

It did not.

It needed some one with imagination to go forward, to continue the saga.
Indeed. His name is JJ Abrams and that's precisely what he's doing.

Or are you suggesting the saga can only continue so long as it continues further into the fictional Trek timeline? That to me is a lack of imagination.
That's fine, things change..

Just don't expect everyone to support this new vision and allow them their opinions.

My opinion, based on Enterprise and this new movie, Star Trek ended with Nemesis.
and there were those who didn't accept TMP either (THEY CHANGED THE UNIFORMS..DAMN THEM TO HELL!!)...and some who didn't accept WOK.(THEY CHANGED THE UNIFORMS..DAMN THEM TO HELL!)..some who didn't like Meyer Trek or Berman Trek etc...


such are rabid ate up fans...


I want to see Trek get back into the limelight it had from '79 to '96, before it got so tired and worn out. Remember from 74 to 79..there was no Trek of any kind..and the general public wanted to see it...now from '04 to '09 there has been no Trek of any kind...and there are stirrings that Joe Sixpack might just "check out that Star Trek movie"..


As long as the SPIRIT of the original is there, I'm all for a re-birth of the franchise...
__________________
The Squonk is of a very retiring disposition and due to its ugliness, weeps constantly. It is easy prey for hunters who simply follow a tear-stained trail. When cornered it will dissolve itself into tears.
goldbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 06:05 AM   #19
TJinPgh
Captain
 
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

Nerys Ghemor wrote: View Post
On the other hand, I think the current continuity works very well as the basis for literature (both official lit AND unofficial fanfic). Not being under the same degree of time and budgetary pressures that a movie is, there's no reason, especially with resources like Memory Alpha and Beta available, that an author cannot do the research to work within the existing continuity. The intricacy is now very well suited to the written format, much like the extreme detail in the Star Wars: Expanded Universe continuity, or Tolkien's Middle Earth.
This has more or less been my point all along.

We are supposed to believe that these guys are brilliant, creative geniuses who can spin gold out of dental floss. Yet, they can't figure out a way to do for $150m what a bunch of fans have done for a fraction of the cost with New Voyages.

Not to mention all of the other fan fiction out there that's centered around all new crews and ships.

All we really have here is Terminator on a starship with a bunch of teen pin ups playing the leads.

Forgive me if I don't see anything overly original or creative about the whole thing.
TJinPgh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2008, 06:12 AM   #20
TJinPgh
Captain
 
Re: 'Star Trek' Needed A Reboot

goldbug wrote: View Post
I want to see Trek get back into the limelight it had from '79 to '96, before it got so tired and worn out. Remember from 74 to 79..there was no Trek of any kind..and the general public wanted to see it...now from '04 to '09 there has been no Trek of any kind...and there are stirrings that Joe Sixpack might just "check out that Star Trek movie"..
The "general public" didn't bring Star Trek back. Paramount wanted to try to cash in on the fact that Sci-Fi was sorta big at the end of the 70s, and it seemed like a decent way to shut Roddenberry up who wouldn't stop asking to do a new show.

And, I really hate to break it to ya, but Joe Sixpack may be talking about checking out a lot of things, but Star Trek isn't one of them.

There are more people talking about Spiderman 4 and Batman 3 than this, and it's already in the can.

I love Trek as much as anybody. But, I realized a long time ago that there's nothing mainstream about it.
TJinPgh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

All posts are the property of the poster. All other original content copyright ©1999-2010 by TrekToday and Christian Höhne Sparborth. TrekToday and its subsidiary sites are in no way affiliated with CBS Studios Inc.. Star Trek®, in all its various forms, and related marks are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective holders. Please read the extended copyright notice.